To stay updated on your favorite discussions, please create an account or log in. Then, click the Bookmark icon to subscribe and receive mail and platform notifications.

Remotely installed PSB 12.01 skips "side-grade" detection and action?

etomcat
etomcat Alumni Posts: 1,172 Firewall Master

Dear Sirs,

 

A customer complains about the following problem seen with FSAV PSB 12.01:

 

When installing it locally on a workstation, the setup process notices, complains about and removes competing products, e.g. Microsoft Essential software, SuperAntispyware, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, etc.

 

When FSAV PSB is installed with centralized, remote method those "sidegrade checks" are apparently not performed and the F-Secure setup process continues merrily, leaving the competitors in place. The sysadmin is afraid this "co-habitation" may casue problems in the future.

 

Please give us a response for this question.

 

Thanks in advance, Yours Sincerely:

Tamas Feher, 2F 2000 Kft., Hungary.

Comments

  • Nizzon
    Nizzon Alumni Posts: 10 Security Scout

    Isnt that another topic?

  • Ben
    Ben Alumni Posts: 664 Cybercrime Crusader

    Hi Tamas

    Could you give us more details(options used) on the centralized installation that didn't perform the sidegrade?

     

    as @Nizzon metioned I moved the post as a separated thread.

  • etomcat
    etomcat Alumni Posts: 1,172 Firewall Master
    Dear Ben,
     
    First time, the customer tried to use the "F-Secure PSB Remote Installation Tool" but it didn't work, as seen in this screenshot. (Probably because the sysadmin is not allowed to install WINS on their Win2008R2 Server, but the F-Secure "push install" tool possibly relies on that legacy protocol to browse the AD domain?)
     
    fsav_psb_remote_install_tool_error.png
     
    Therefore, I recommended him an alternative:
     
    - Install F-Secure Policy Manager 12.00 as a 30-day trial
     
    - Import the downloadable FSAV PSB 12.01 build 283 package .JAR file in the PM Console
     
    - In the PM Console, re-export the .JAR to .MSI
     
    - The export wizard asks for two pieces of data: the customer's 20-digit licence keycode (in this case UJ7C-...) and the national choice for the local GUI of PSB (in this case the hungarian language)
     
    - The exported .MSI file is then placed in an Active Directory Group Policy Object (GPO) and distributed to the Windows workstations for installation.
     
    (Background information: this little-known remote installation method works because F-Secure Business Suite officially supports cross-grading to F-Secure PSB, therefore the Policy Manager Console supports importing and exporting the FSAV PSB .JAR file.)
     
    Yours Sincerely: Tamas Feher, 2F 2000 Kft., Hungary.
  • etomcat
    etomcat Alumni Posts: 1,172 Firewall Master

    Hello,

     

    Can you please give us a status update on why PSB 12 installation "sidegrade" checks don't work when the setup package is delivered to the endpoints via GPO in .MSI file format?

     

    Can you give u access to the latest version of the standalone "Sidegrade" tool?

     

    Thanks in advance, Yours Sincerely:

    Tamas Feher, 2F 2000 Kft., Hungary.

This discussion has been closed.